Book/Report

FZJ-2019-01429

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png Evaluation of human reliability analysis methods addressing cognitive error modelling and quantification

Reer, B.FZJ* ; Mertens, J.FZJ* ; Sträter, O.

1996
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag Jülich

Please use a persistent id in citations: http://hdl.handle.net/2128/21636

Report No.: Juel-3222

Abstract: Actions and errors by the operating personnel, which are of significance for the safety of a technical system, are classified according to various criteria. Each type of action thus identified is roughly discussed with respect to its quantifiability by state-of-the-art human reliability analysis (A) within a probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). Thereby, the principal limits of quantifying human actions are discussed with special emphasis on data quality and cognitive error modelling. In this connection, the basic procedure for a IIRA is briefly described under realistic conditions. With respect to the quantitative part of a IRA - the determination of error probabilities - an evaluating description of the standard method THERP (Technique of Human Error Rate Prediction) is given using eight evaluation criteria. Furthermore, six new developments (EdF'sPFHRA, HCR, HCR/ORE, SLIM, HEART, INTENT) are briefly described and roughly evaluated. The report concludes with a catalogue of requirements for HRA methods.

---

Contributing Institute(s):

1. Publikationen vor 2000 (PRE-2000)

Research Program(s):

1. 899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899) (POF3-899)

---

Database coverage:

---